[Fedora-legal-list] Openssl license "infectivness" and GPLv2 compatibility
Michal Hlavinka
mhlavink at redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 11:19:34 UTC 2009
Hi,
I'm maintaining apcupsd package. Apcupsd itself is under GPLv2 license.
Apcupsd daemon in this package is linked against a few libraries including
net-snmp and openssl.
licenses are (based on License tag in rpm):
OpenSSL : OpenSSL
net-snmp : BSD and MIT
I'd like to know answers for these questions:
1) Is apcupsd allowed to link against openssl since openssl seems to be
incompatible with GPLv2? [1]
2) Because net-snmp itself is linked against openssl, should not its license
in fact be BSD and MIT and OpenSSL?
3) If apcupsd is not allowed to link against openssl, is it allowed to link
against net-snmp which is linked against openssl?
Cheers,
Michal Hlavinka
[1] http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv2-
incompatible_licenses
More information about the Fedora-legal-list
mailing list