[Fedora-legal-list] EUPL v1.1 ?

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 05/29/2009 12:40 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:

> Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual
> licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it
> acceptable for us.

If a software is dual licensed and if any one of them is acceptable to
Fedora, the software will be permitted in Fedora (ie) if EUPL v1.x is
not acceptable, then we would accept it in Fedora under the LGPLv2 license.

Rahul