Installed with disastrous results
Iain Buchanan
iain at pcorp.com.au
Thu Dec 4 01:48:51 UTC 2003
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 10:03, Robert L Cochran wrote:
[snip]
> That brings up the conceptually hard part: if you install Linux on
> /dev/hda and also on /dev/hdb, you have to edit the grub.conf and
> /etc/fstab files and use the e2label program to make sure your drives
> have unique partition labels.
Not even this is necessary, the installer should have done that:
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 22:32, PCDEBB | Fedora-list wrote:
> I usually let the install auto allocate the sizes for me,
[Rob:]
> But for your purposes, so long as you installed the grub bootloader you
> should be able to dual boot both Windows 2000 and Fedora with no sweat.
> You can pretty much trust the installer. It doesn't wreck anything, at
> least it doesn't in my experience.
I agree!
--
Iain Buchanan <iain at pcorp.nospam.com.au>
Time-sharing is the junk-mail part of the computer business.
-- H.R.J. Grosch (attributed)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031204/b7331139/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list