Fedora breaks dhcpd, RH9 doesn't?
andrew.crofts at nokia.com
andrew.crofts at nokia.com
Wed Dec 10 12:06:12 UTC 2003
Thanks, Mike, however....
Haven't tried that yet, because the firewall script (which I haven't posted, because of sheer size, but it's basically here:
http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/stronger-firewall-examples.html
) is also identical when using RH9 and Fedora 1. I'm pretty strict with the First Written Law Of Engineering (i.e., if it wasn't written down, it didn't happen!)and every step's documented.
I will try when I get home - and can pull the Internet socket out!
But I've a feeling it's a compatibility someplace.
Daft Q. but i'm assuming dhcpd's built into FC1's kernel?? Not-too-brave assumption, but...
-Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-admin at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-list-admin at redhat.com]On Behalf Of ext Michael Kearey
> Sent: 10 December, 2003 13:46
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: Fedora breaks dhcpd, RH9 doesn't?
>
>
> andrew.crofts at nokia.com wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Synopsis - install RH9, dhcpd works, gives out addresses.
> > Install or upgrade to Fedora Core 1, dhcp no longer gives
> addresses. Repeatable (two RH 9 installs, 2 Fedora installs,
> one RH9-FC1 update from CD's)
>
> Hi there,
>
> Very quickly, and I know probably the first thing you tried -
> firewall
> setting?
>
> Try turning firewall off 'service iptables stop' then test.
> I have a FC 1 box doing dhcpd service and it is quite ok..
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list