Better POP daemon?

[Gordon Messmer]

Steven W. Orr wrote:
> 
> I'm using qpopper. My sysadmin friends all tell me that's the premier pop3 
> server out there. And it's even available in an rpm. I'll leave a copy at 
> http://steveo.syslang.net/qpopper-4.0.4-0.1.src.rpm

Depends on how it's used.  If your users leave mail on the server, 
qpopper is horribly, horribly inefficient.  Even UW-IMAP is better.

I can't really name any significant advantages to qpopper under any 
workload.