why sendmail and not postfix?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

And qmail is also proprietary... not Free Software, while Postfix, Exim,
Sendmail and others all are, and as such are compatible with Fedora's
objectives (which, I dare to add, silently dropped focusing on user's
freedom).

Rui

On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 17:57, Fulvio wrote:
> qmail is fantastic. Postfix is simple to configure
> 
> > Fulvio wrote:
> > 
> > >why sendmail and not postfix?
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >fedora-list mailing list
> > >fedora-list at redhat.com
> > >To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > qmail works very well on Fedora.  My Fedora/qmail mail server has been 
> > running for a few weeks now and performs well.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031204/894e4eb7/attachment-0001.sig>