Open Source, Free Software, and Public Domain
Rui Miguel Seabra
rms at 1407.org
Wed Dec 10 23:36:47 UTC 2003
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 21:53, Exile In Paradise wrote:
> Generically, Rui's question begs the return question, which was better
> for users? That M$ had a codebase to start from that was public domain,
> or for Windows users to be kept off the net until someone told them
> about WinSock?
Oh, by then it wasn't an issue. The majority of the computer population
did not even think seriously about using Windows ;)
And most net-people were running on some kind of Unix.
> Having M$ steal BSD's code could be said to have created more problems
> for the rest of the world than it solved for the users, but it DID give
> the Windows users the ability to get on the Internet...
Like I said, by then it wasn't a serious issue. They weren't so
"restricted" to Windows as nowadays.
> So, for Windows users it was a benefit that the BSD folks had a codebase
> out there that M$ could incorporate.
Much the same as it was a benefit for slaves when they ate a little more
when their master was in a particularly good mood...
> The RFC's are public domain right?
Not necessarily, and most are not.
> Why shouldn't there be a public domain TCP/IP core that implements them?
Maybe there is, I don't know (nor do I really care).
> If TCP/IP software was GPL, thats fine... M$ would have still had the
> standard and probably other stacks to work from too... we would have all
> suffered more from their steeper learning curve then, but it would not
> have made a lick of difference from the standpoint of slowing them down.
I think it would. Look at the time they took killing Netscape :)
Had they started from the beginning... I can't even dare thinking about
it.
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031210/07ef513f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list