Install on 32 meg celeron machine

[Pierre Lamb]

Well I have gotten XP to run on 32megs, slowly but it
runs I have also gotten RH9.0 to run on the same 32
megs minus gui
--- WipeOut <wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Steve Watford wrote:
> 
> >They are running IE something. They are on SP 6. 
> Although they are slow and the
> > graphics are limited. 800x600 16 color I think.
> They work.  FC1 refuses to try
> >to install, anaconda just exits. RH9 did install,
> although it won't run X
> >without swapping to disk so much that the HD starts
> throwing timeout errors. 
> >Guess I'm just going to have  upgrade the ram. 
> Funny that for linux we need to
> >upgrade the hardware that WinNT will run on.  Sort
> of a reversal.  I know there
> >are lighter versions of linux out there, but we
> have settled on RH,Fedora.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >  
> >
> Your comparison is a little skewed, you are
> comparing the latest Linux 
> system with a prehistoric windows version..
> If you want to compare to WinNT you should be trying
> to install RH5.x. 
> If you are comparing to FC1 then you need to use
> Windows 2003..
> 
> I don't think Windows 2003 would be too happy on
> 32MB of RAM either.. ;-)
> 
> Later..
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/