Freshrpms.net concerns.

Mike Burger mburger at bubbanfriends.org
Sat Nov 8 19:54:52 UTC 2003


At least, I thought it was...maybe I'm wrong?

Mike Burger wrote:
> Keeping in mind that the FreshRPMS repository is comprised of RPMS 
> compiled from the RH/Fedora SRPMS?
> 
> Kevin Francis wrote:
> 
>> I find myself in complete agreement with you. It is important that
>> people realise that they cannot mix and match repositories.
>>
>> I want cool apps too, but not at the price I might have to pay.
>>
>> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:33, Jonathan C. Sitte wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Is freshrpms.net working with Fedora or just creating rpms without even
>>> thinking about what we have all been talking about? I am concerned
>>> because it seems like everyone is using it anyways... It is interesting
>>> how things are developing here. I am being very careful not to just
>>> start loading Fedora with 3rd Party rpms until I know that they are safe
>>> to use. I HIGHLY recomend that http://fedora.redhat.com/ posts a section
>>> for TRUSTED rpm repositories or the repositories themself have a
>>> specific icon that says Fedora Safe or something of that matter. They
>>> can all use the same icon or banner... It would be nice... Just an 
>>> idea ;)


-- 
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000

To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:

site-update-request at bubbanfriends.org

with a message of:

subscribe





More information about the fedora-list mailing list