yum- has the http location changed?

[Benjamin Arai]

There server(s) for the RPMS/updates was down.  This is kind of a bad
first step for Fedora.


On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:01, Dave Roberts wrote:

> Yes, it's back working now. This looks to be a weekend problem.
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 07:31, nosp wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 14:26, Schlueri wrote:
> > > Am Mo, den 17.11.2003 schrieb nosp um 15:19:
> > [...]
> > > > See:
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2003-November/msg03853.html
> > > 
> > > I think it's time for an updated up2date package with corrected url's in config file or 
> > > an statement on fedora.redhat.com. Is there no errata site?
> > > 
> > > This is definitivly a FAQ.
> > 
> > It's only been about 48 hours, and those 48 were over a weekend.  I bet
> > just about now RH people should be getting to the bottom of all the
> > "what are the right yum/up2date sources??!?!" emails and sorting out the
> > problem.  If there wasn't a likelihood of situation changing, I'd agree
> > with you...let's give them a bit of time...
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
Benjamin Arai <benjamin at araisoft.com>
Araisoft Corp.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031117/ee2b26c0/attachment-0001.htm>