Yum is not an .rpm package error message
BFD
bfd at pcisys.net
Tue Nov 18 14:23:14 UTC 2003
Tom Mitchell wrote:
>The web download and the disc versions look exactly the same to me.
> $ md5sum /mnt/cdrom/Fedora/RPMS/yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm /tmp/yum*
> dd4249018c1674b73e9ddab08828303f /mnt/cdrom/Fedora/RPMS/yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
> dd4249018c1674b73e9ddab08828303f /tmp/yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
> $ sum /mnt/cdrom/Fedora/RPMS/yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm /tmp/yum*
> 29472 127 /mnt/cdrom/Fedora/RPMS/yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
> 29472 127 /tmp/yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
>
>Did you save the bad file. If so how does it compare with
>the above and with the version on your disc.
>
For the file from my Fedora cd:
$md5sum yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
dd4249018c1674b73e9ddab08828303f yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
$sum yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
29472 127
For the file I downloaded
$md5sum yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
8a82c3f05fca0a615d1765394376f809 yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
$sum yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm
47550 127
>By chance does the file contain something like an HTML message that says try
>later? Look at the bad file with 'file' and with 'less'.
>
>
The file command shows type data. Less shows "yum-2.0.4-2.noarch.rpm:
not an rpm package (or package manifest):"
I suspect that the repository file is corrupt, as I've installed the one
off my Fedora CD and it works as it should.
BFD
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list