Suggestion regarding "no subject"
charlescurley at charlescurley.com
Fri Nov 21 19:19:59 UTC 2003
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:43:42AM -0800, Don wrote:
> Messages without subjects are a point of frustration for a lot of
> people. Right up there with "It doesn't work" as a problem
> What would it take for the list server to simply reject posts without
> a subject back to the sender. That way the "no subject" message never
> gets distributed.
> It obviously doesn't prevent someone from using "no subject", but if
> somebody does that intentionally they deserve to get "no reply"
> either. ;-)
If you do this, send the culprit a message explaining why the messages
is being rejected, and, perhaps, point the culprit to a page on
netiquette, such as http://www.charlescurley.com/netiquette.html
Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the fedora-list