Freshrpms.net concerns.

[Mike Burger]

Keeping in mind that the FreshRPMS repository is comprised of RPMS 
compiled from the RH/Fedora SRPMS?

Kevin Francis wrote:
> I find myself in complete agreement with you. It is important that
> people realise that they cannot mix and match repositories.
> 
> I want cool apps too, but not at the price I might have to pay.
> 
> On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:33, Jonathan C. Sitte wrote:
> 
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Is freshrpms.net working with Fedora or just creating rpms without even
>>thinking about what we have all been talking about? I am concerned
>>because it seems like everyone is using it anyways... It is interesting
>>how things are developing here. I am being very careful not to just
>>start loading Fedora with 3rd Party rpms until I know that they are safe
>>to use. I HIGHLY recomend that http://fedora.redhat.com/ posts a section
>>for TRUSTED rpm repositories or the repositories themself have a
>>specific icon that says Fedora Safe or something of that matter. They
>>can all use the same icon or banner... It would be nice... Just an idea ;)


-- 
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000

To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:

site-update-request at bubbanfriends.org

with a message of:

subscribe