Freshrpms.net concerns.

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:31:22PM +0100, Konrad Kosmowski wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > For FC1 there are currently only three repos providing FC1 packages,
> > so conflict probability is very low. In fact I have all three repos'
> > contents fully installed on my machine :)
> 
> AtRPMS, FreshRPMS (actually it is not in early stage of rebuilding 
> everything) and? What is the third one? :-)

And the winner is ...
newrpms!

I am sure that dag and PlanetCCRMA will follow next, as well as the
other 11-5 repos :)

> I'am very curious about Fedora, but I'll think I'll wait a little
> more, don't get me wrong I'm not trolling. But I remember switch
> from 7.3 to 8.0, few hours and back to 7.3. I've finally decided to
> switch right from 7.3 to 9 since it was much better.

RH9 to FC1 isn't that dramatic as 7.3 to 8.0.
But it is early to tell, of course.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031108/11c3cf58/attachment-0001.sig>