Freshrpms.net concerns.
bishop
bishop at platypus.bc.ca
Sun Nov 9 12:11:46 UTC 2003
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 08:22:05PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 12:41, Marc Williams wrote:
>>
>>>I *think* that ATrpms, Freshrpms, Dag, and a few others collude so as to
>>>make these sorts of conflicts unlikely.
>>
>>Wouldn't it be great if all these projects will start to co-ordinate
>>with each other somehow? To not re-invent the whell and all that...
>
> Yes, and they already do.
Yes, but ..
> [root at ithaca bin]# rpm -q apt
> apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
> [root at ithaca bin]# rpm -i http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/dist/rh9/atrpms/atrpms-25-1.rh9.at.noarch.rpm
> warning: /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.UGY9M7: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b
> file /etc/apt/rpmpriorities from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
> file /etc/apt/sources.list from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
> file /etc/apt/vendors.list from install of atrpms-25-1.rh9.at conflicts with file from package apt-0.5.5cnc6-fr1
I've probably mailed you on this bug already.
I've caused rippling, repeating failures in whole NSC clusters. Your
coordination is no match for the awesome bug-finding power of my karma!
Moohahahahahaha! (aka "my karma ran over your coordination") 8-)
- bish
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list