Updating options
Mike Watson
mikew at crucis.net
Mon Nov 10 00:29:07 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:10 pm, Markku Kolkka wrote:
> Neil B. Cohen kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Maanantai 10.
>
> Marraskuuta 2003 00:01):
> > I see that yum
> > exists on my Fedora system but apt (or apt-get) does not. Can
> > someone tell me if I need to use either or both of these in
> > addition to up2date? Instead of up2date?
>
> No, the new up2date version can access both yum and apt format
> repositories.
>
> > What repositories should I be pointing
> > to for yum or apt-get? Is the standard configuration acceptable?
>
> It keeps your Fedora Core packages updated, but not any extra or
> third-party packages.
this brings up a question...
I'm building a Fedora system that was previous SuSE. Is there an
equivalent to RHN? I always nice to have an idicator showing when an
update is ready rather than continuously checking with cron.
Mike W
- --
Registered Linux - 256979 (http://counter.il.org for more information)
NRA Life
ARS: W0TMW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/rtvT5fq6h2uDDlQRAmR5AKDsT3P141t6vQSl7iwty1EfgVAeOQCgiOhR
Fw8YCvcFeXDfO/szrEaxPvk=
=iHfR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list