block-major-135 and Kernel questions
AuntieParticle
AuntieParticle at satx.rr.com
Tue Nov 25 01:29:32 UTC 2003
I got the old kernel removed just fine. Thanks.
More on the "modprobe: modprobe can't locate module block-major-135"
problem: I have noticed that it's not just block-major-135 but a whole
list of block-major-XXX. I am unable to read all the numbers because
they go by so quickly. Is there some sort of boot log I can refer to so
that I can read the errors at a speed at which my eyes can focus. I have
also noticed that they happen right after the "Checking for new
Hardware" section of the boot. So I am wondering if FC1 is just not
happy about not finding any new hardware :) I have tried out my printer,
CD-RW, and Zip drive and everything works just fine in FC1 once it boots
all the way. I am just very curious about the errors.
Thanks
> On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 10:15, AuntieParticle wrote:
>
>>> I have just upgraded from RH9 to Fedora Core 1 using the very helpful
>>> HowTo here:
>>> http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~vschmidt/notes/redhat2fedora/index.htm
>>>
>>> It all went very well but each time I boot FC1 I see the following error:
>>>
>>> modprobe: modprobe can't locate module block-major-135
>>>
>>> Then it proceeds through the rest of the boot okay.
>>>
>>> I looked up block 135 in devices.txt and it seems to be for SCSI disk
>>> devices.... of which I have none on my system. Is there a way to get
>>> rid of this error?
>>
>>
>
>My devices.txt doesn't show block-major-135, but in /dev it is listed as
>/dev/sdig (I'm really running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 AS at the
>moment) and that is odd, but not fatal. You can suppress the message by
>adding the line to /etc/modules.conf:
>
>alias block-major-135 off
>
>
>
>>> Also, since upgrading to FC1 I now have 2 kernels that show up in Grub,
>>> the one I had with RH9 and the new one that FC1 upgrade installed. FC1
>>> boots to the new one by default of course and that is just fine. What
>>> I'd like to know is how can I, or even should I, remove the old kernel?
>>
>>
>
>Sure you can remove the older kernel. But you need to be specific when
>doing so. If the kernel you need to remove is kernel-2.4.20-20.9, then
>you can remove it by running:
>
># rpm -e kernel-2.4.20-20.9
>
>Don't just say "rpm -e kernel". Normally it will tell you that kernel
>represents multiple packages and exit doing nothing, but if you have
>only one kernel in the rpm database, this might remove it.
>
> -- Chris Kloiber Red Hat, Inc.
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list