dictd

[bishop]

Evgeney,

I've read the email exchange, and I don't understand the question.

What do you mean "Why has this not been included"?  Is the WHY so much 
more important than the HOW?

  - bish

Evgeney wrote:

> Yes, the second question may been reformulated as
> 1)/What's the procedure for including /packages/?/
> 2)/What should/can be done?/
> 
> And there is still first question why the latest version of dictd is not 
> in fedora?
> 
> Regards,
> Evgeney.
> 
> ? ???, 28.10.2003, ? 20:41, Doncho N. Gunchev ???????:
> 
>>/> On Tuesday 28 October 2003 18:37, Evgeney wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> My answer is about packages in fedora.
>>>
>>> 1)Why dictd package is still 1.5.5? The latest version is 1.9.7. Look at
>>> //ftp://ftp.dict.org/pub/dict/.
>>> 2)Why you do not include aspell-ru package? There are aspell-fr,
>>> aspell-en, aspell-it
>>> But there is no aspell-ru. There is such package look at
>>> http://aspell.net
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Evgeney.
>>There's http://bgoffice.sourceforge.net/
>>  OOo-spell-bg-3.0.zip, OOo-hyph-bg-3.0.zip, aspell-bg-3.0.tar.gz, ispell-bg-3.0.tar.gz
>>  all in http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=52198
>>
>>  KDE has Bulgarian localization built in, but RedHat did not support Bulgarian language
>>and kde-i18n-Bulgarian was not distributed. I supose that including all kde localizations
>>can take a lot of space...
>>
>>I think the questions are:
>>	What's the procedure for including them?
>>	What should/can be done?/
>>

-- 
	"I'm almost tempted to go onto kazaa and download some of my own
	music, just to see if the riaa would sue me for having mp3's of
	my own songs on my hard-drive."		-- moby
	http://www.moby.com/cms/viewdiary.asp?Diary_ID=1487&ViewType=Current