The more I read the confuser I get.-the answer

Fri Oct 31 06:57:10 UTC 2003

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:10:25 +1100 (EST), Con Tassios wrote:

> 
> > And of course there is no */Guarantee/* that RedHat will continue to 
> > make SRPMs
> > available to freeloaders.  The GPL doesn't require them to provide 
> > SRPM's to people
> > to whom RedHat has not given binaries.
> 
> If Red Hat stop making the SRPMS available to the those who haven't subscribed 
> to RHEL, all it takes is one paying customer to release them on their own FTP 
> servers.

Why should that customer do that? It would threaten Red Hat's business
model. That should not be in the interest of a paying enterprise
customer.

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031031/6996b90e/attachment-0001.sig>