Fedora and the System Administrator -- there are a lot of variables here ...
David Holden
dh at iucr.org
Thu Oct 2 16:12:06 UTC 2003
On Thursday 02 Oct 2003 4:44 pm, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Quoting David Holden <dh at iucr.org>:
> > When fedora is release will I beable to say to my boss, yes we can
> > install fedora version "x" and be able to rely on redhat providing
> > security updates for the next 2-3 years for that version, or will
> > have have to say to my boss if you want a stable OS for 2-3year you
> > will have to cough up $345 for system/per year.
>
> First off, the last time I checked, RHEL WS is $179/year (or are you
> talking about ES?).
yes ES.
>
> > As far as I know for version of Microsoft OS's your guaranteed >3 years
> > use of that OS and security updates are *free*.
> > (Yes I know microsoft and security are words that really don't mix :))
>
> Secondly, Microsoft has the volume to sustain security updates on a $99-199
> product. Red Hat does not.
Of course which is back to my original post, about the cost of doing this,
assuming the WS edition (>3x179) again $99-199.
>
> *BUT* if you keep your Fedora Core current to at least 6 months, possibly a
> year (if I'm reading the details correctly), you _do_ have such updates.
Yes this is find if keeping Fedora core current doesn't break important
things that users are used to, e.g. kde desktop settings etc..
>
> If you need 1-7 years, then you need to purchase a product that will
> support the vendor who does it, given the volume they sell at.
Of course and again back to my original post,
Dave
--
Dr. David Holden. (Systems Developer)
Crystallography Journals Online: <http://journals.iucr.org>
Thanks in advance:-
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See: <http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
UK Privacy (R.I.P) : http://www.stand.org.uk/commentary.php3
Public GPG key available on request.
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list