Is the Print Support and OpenOffice Yes/No really honored

[Charles Curley]

On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:11:59PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:14:40PM +0100, Matheesha wrote:

> > The same goes for Open Office. I chose not to install any
> > Office/Productivity apps and yet Open Office libraries are
> > installed.
> 
> I believe that this is a bug, but I haven't filed it yet. I spotted it
> in Beta 1, but am waiting to confirm it on Beta 2.
> 
> There is no reason for the OOo libraries to be installed other than
> for OOo itself. I can't guess why there are three separate packages,
> unless it is to keep the package size down to an average of 35 MB
> each. I find this one particularly egregious because they account for
> some 230 MB installed, and my test machine has 1.6 GB of usable disk
> space.

I added this as a comment to bug 88400.

> 
> -- 
> 
> Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
> and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
> http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email
> 
> Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB



-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20031002/0ec2db1c/attachment-0001.sig>