dev fs LABEL=/

[W. Chris Shank]

I didn't apply any patches to the stock fedora kernel:
linux-2.4.22-1.2061.nptl

I applied the acpi patches to the kernel.org 2.4.22 kernel. I'm
attempting to compile the vanilla kernel with the fedora config.

On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 11:45, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 11:35, W. Chris Shank wrote:
> > Still won't compile:
> > 
> > kernel/kernel.o(.text+0xf9f): In function `schedule':
> > : undefined reference to `active_load_balance'
> > make[1]: *** [kallsyms] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.22-1.2061.nptl'
> > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2
> > 
> > Me thinks the source tree is out of sync with the kernel delivered.
> 
> Which patches did you install?  Perhaps some patch you used didn't work
> quite well with those already in the RH kernel.
> 
> > 
> > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 11:03, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 10:45, W. Chris Shank wrote:
> > > > I tried to compile a custom 2.4.22 kernel - when I boot it I get a VFS
> > > > kernel panic error saying it cannot open root device LABEL=/ or 00:00.
> > > > I'm looking through xconfig to see if I don't have devfs setup. I used
> > > > the .config included with fedora core kernel source. It doesn't surprise
> > > > me that the .config isn't accurate - I couldn't get the fedora core
> > > > source to compile acpi, so i think it's not an accurate source tree.
> > > 
> > > You probably want to use the config files found in /boot that you get
> > > from installing a kernel image.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Any pointers the devfs issue is appreciated.
> > > > 
> > > > thanks
-- 
W. Chris Shank
ACE Technology Group, LLC
chris.shank at acetechgroup.com
http://www.acetechgroup.com