CNET News Article

[Steve Bergman]

On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 12:15, Jeff Lasman wrote:

> 
> What we need is continued vulnerability-patching for core releases for a 
> long time.  While that might seem to make us primary candidates for the 
> RHEL versions, with cabinets with 50 servers apiece and annual 
> subscription charges that model will never work for us.
> 
> So far I've seen nothing on continued vulnerability-patching for RHL 
> 7.3, or for RH9.  If there is any, it appears to be well-hidden, and if 
> you know of any, please tell me.
> 

See: 

http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy