[Re: [Re: no graphical boot since last kernel update]]
Gerry Tool
gstool at earthlink.net
Thu Oct 30 00:57:18 UTC 2003
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 15:38, Don R Maxwell wrote:
> Michael Kearey <mutk at iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Sean Middleditch wrote:
> >
> > >>Hmm . From dmesg :
> > >> Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb
> > >>In my grub.conf
> > >> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2110.nptl ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>And I still boot in plain old text [ Ok ] thing. Any other tips? (Not
> > >>that I care *that* much about it)
> > >
> > >
> > > Just to double check, you do have rhgb still installed, yes? Also, are
> > > you sure there are no typos in your sysconfig GRAPHICAL=yes line?
> >
> > rpm -q rhgb
> > rhgb-0.11.1-2
> >
> > From /etc/sysconfig/init:
> >
> > # anything else => new style bootup without ANSI colors or positioning
> > BOOTUP=color
> > # Turn on graphical boot
> > GRAPHICAL=yes
> >
> >
> > Still no graphical boot. Quite odd.
>
> Ditto. Or at least from one machine. I have two machines running test3. One
> works with graphical boot, the other does not. The one that does not is an
> OLD HP Vectra VL. It has a P2 and 128MB RAM. The one that does work is a
> little Compaq Presario with a Celeron and 320MB. Neither has any of the new
> fancy graphics cards. The fact that they differ in this relatively minor way
> is indeed odd.
You currently have to add "rhgb" without quotes to the end of the kernel
line in /etc/grub.conf to get the graphical boot to work. This was
mentioned on one of the lists a few days ago.
Gerry
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list