RH 2.4.18 vs RH 2.4.20 performance slowdown
Michael Schwendt
ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Thu Sep 4 08:39:21 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:35:27 -0600, Dax Kelson wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90116
This is highly interesting, IMO. This could be exactly _the problem_
which is reported by some users of Red Hat Linux [9] as "general
slowness" while others with the same or nearly the same h/w and s/w
configuration can't reproduce it. Keep testing!
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Vvo50iMVcrivHFQRAmEvAKCFHOKRt1rAaHFumX+OyKLkQxaWhQCcDn+S
k7v8GxEg2Wwj7ylMw5SjKNs=
=e/Vu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list