RES: Support of apt for fedora
James Keasley
jamesk at homeric.co.uk
Wed Sep 24 21:03:17 UTC 2003
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 21:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:27:33 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> > But apt has the advance, that you can install every package over
> > the internet, without worrying about dependicies and so on.
>
> up2date can do that, too, for a long time.
>
> And Yum also.
Yes, while I haven't tried Yum yet apt-get has the advantage over
up2date in that it makes it easier to install new packages, and
it can resume stalled downloads, which IIRC up2date, can't.
A combination of up2date, for delivering patches and fixes, and
apt-get, for installing newly available packages, would be ideal.
--
James
jamesk[at]homeric[dot]co[dot]uk
"Chivalry is for those wearing Kevlar" - Kincaid on #afp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20030924/88fb7c73/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list