GUMBY GRUB

Res res at ausics.net
Mon Apr 5 23:57:54 UTC 2004


*sigh* see my previous post, i dont care what the headers say, i dont even
read most the posts  on here cause the signal to noise ratio is
excesive with ppl like you adding to it. I spose the days just prior to
xmas where this list was sending only half of everbodies posts was my
fault as well :) anyway  i repeat, the care factor is non existant.
life goes on.


On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Alexander Dalloz wrote:

> Am Mo, den 05.04.2004 schrieb Res um 23:08:
>
> > point out to me the original post on this thread, do it with full
> > reference to the list archives, in fact I invite you to sent me the entire
> > thread GUMBY GRUB and show WHERE i did NOT start it.
>
> Received:  from roswell.ausics.net (roswell.ausics.net [203.220.55.150])
> by valhalla.ausics.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
> i339IaAV010286    for <fedora-list at redhat.com>; Sat, 03 Apr 2004
> 19:18:37 +1000
> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 19:18:28 +1000 (EST)
> From: Res <res at ausics.net>
> Subject: GUMBY GRUB
> In-reply-to:  <406E743A.7090503 at glossolalie.org>
> Sender:  fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Errors-to:  fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
> Reply to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-id:  <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404031914130.5232 at ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg>
> MIME-version:  1.0
> Precedence:  junk
> X-Loop:  fedora-list at redhat.com
> X-BeenThere:  fedora-list at redhat.com
> X-Valhalla-MailScanner:  This message was found to be clean of known
> virus's
> X-RedHat-Spam-Score:  0.567
> X-Spam-Status:  seams to be clean: hits=-4.901 required=5 tests=BAYES_00
> X-Spam-Checker-Version:  SpamAssassin 2.63 on Metatron
> References:  <1080977062.2597.4.camel at hostserver>
> <406E743A.7090503 at glossolalie.org>
>
> So, your initial posting contained not only the "In-reply-to" header tag
> but too the "References" tag. I do not know how much you know about
> mail, but what do you think does the "References" stay for and come
> from? I can answer you: as you did a reply mail and no freshly new one.
>
> Alexander
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Res





More information about the fedora-list mailing list