signature.asc files

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 15:59 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote:
> > > RFC's are guidelines, not standards. I have not seeing any software out
> > > there that adheres 100% to the RFC's, there are always relaxed
> > > interpretations.
> > 
> > HTTP 1.1 is a standard. Right? Wrong?
> > Right! The standard is RFC 2616 IIRC.
> >                        ^^^
> > 
> Just a tiny point, just because some thing has an RFC, and is a
> standard, does not mean it's a standard due to the existence of the RFC.

I agree, but just because it is an RFC it doens't mean it's not a
standard :) (which is what I was refuting!)

Rui
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040427/78919e96/attachment-0001.sig>