MUA Filters vs Procmail filters[was] RE: Mailing list procmail recipe
Steve Searle
mail at stevesearle.com
Wed Apr 7 09:02:00 UTC 2004
Around 09:46am on Wednesday, April 07, 2004 (UK time), Ow Mun Heng scrawled:
> But I digress. What's the benefit of using procmail vs MUA filters???
In my opinion using procmail is better because then it doesn't restrict
you to a single email client. Using procmail, IMAP, and ssh I can read
my email from a variety of machines, both local and remote.
I suspect procmail may allow for more complex filtering than is available
in many, if not all email clients. Also using procmail to feed emails
through spamassassin before I get to read them, means I don't have to
wait for them to be processed when I am actually reading the email.
Cheers
Steve
--
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Red Hat Linux
V_/_ No MS products were used in the creation of this message
9:56am up 31 days, 18:21, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.01
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040407/37c8e061/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list