Some problems getting started

William Hooper whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net
Wed Apr 7 23:40:56 UTC 2004


Satish Balay said:

>> So you agree that yum is better than r-c-p after packages have been
>> upgraded?
>
> I meant to convey yum is useable/reliable - before packages
> have been updated as well - not limited to "after packages have been
> upgraded". And I do prefer yum to r-c-p.

I believe we are in agreement.  Maybe I was unclear in my wording...

Yum is more reliable than r-c-p, because r-c-p isn't reliable after you
upgrade packages.

-- 
William Hooper





More information about the fedora-list mailing list