extend EOL for Red Hat Linux 9?

Guy Fraser guy at incentre.net
Thu Apr 8 15:05:47 UTC 2004


Douglas Furlong wrote:

>On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 00:12, James Ralston wrote:
>  
>
>>On 2004-04-04 at 10:54:14-04 William Hooper <whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Arguably the most popular release was 7.3, and it's support wasn't
>>>extended.
>>>      
>>>
>>I would suspect Red Hat's reasoning was that people could still
>>upgrade to RHL9.
>>    
>>
>Just a small point, but as a purchaser of 10 RHN licences I got a email
>several months ago, informing me of the EOL of RHL9, and due to the
>purchase of the RHN licence I am entitled to the RHELWS product.
>
>So any one that has payed for a RHL9 RHN subscription still has an
>upgrade path.
>
>Seems more then reasonable to me.
>
>Doug
>  
>
Make the call...

That opportunity was only until the end of Feb.

And now you get nothing.

Grrrr....





More information about the fedora-list mailing list