No Pine, no tripwire.

[info]

pine 4.58 compiles and runs real well on FC1
I had no problems with it
just do a ./compile slx for generic linux install and poof........
pine in your box.

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:

> It would appear that on Apr 12, ne... did say:
>
> > On Apr 12, 2004 at 07:26, dante at virtualblueness.net in a soothing rage wrote:
> > >1. Does anyone know why tripwire was dropped?  Can the maintainers be
> > >convinced to re-add it?  (Is this some license issue?  Time to write
> > >some replacement?)
> > Check the fedora-devel list archives. I believe there was some
> > discussion of this there. I believe you will also find a tripwire
> > rpm at fedora.us. Dag's repo also has a pine rpm.
>
> One word of caution here. I don't know from direct experience, but I've
> heard from several sources that some of the packages from any of the
> freshrpms repositories can conflict with some packages from fedora.us and
> livna.org repositories.
>
> Dag is one of several freshrpm repositories.
>
> So If you decide to get pine from dag (works great BTW) I'd check all
> the freshrpms repositories before installing tripwire from fedora.us.
>
> OR if I _was_ getting tripwire from fedora.us, I'd search it and
> livna.org for pine.
>
> I've also heard that the pine source tarball does compile and run well
> on FC1, but again, this is all hearsay...
>
>
> --
> |   ---   ___
> |   <0>   <->	   Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
> |	^		J(tWdy)P
> |    ~\___/~	     <<jtwdyp at ttlc.net>>
>
> But if I actually knew everything, then I'd know I was an idiot...
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>