Ethernet

Jeff Vian jvian10 at charter.net
Tue Apr 13 15:18:32 UTC 2004



bulent wrote:

> Jeff Vian wrote:
>
>>
>> So your problem is ???????
>>
>> bulent wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Diamond wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:57 AM Bülent Açy'kgöz
>>>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Link detected: no
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                            ^^^^^
>>>>>> You see that? You have no link, thus you can not
>>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> successfully change
>>>>
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...snip...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still no link! Check your cables. Check the other
>>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> side of the cable,
>>>>
>>>>>> check the plug in the switch/hub/router or where it
>>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> is.
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> No I have link , Because I am downloading eveything
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> also
>>>>
>>>>> working samba and others.
>>>>> Do you have any suggesstion?
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bülent,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please post your 'ifconfig -a' output?
>>>>
>>>> Eric Diamond
>>>> eDiamond Networking & Security
>>>> 303-246-9555
>>>> eric at ediamond.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>> Hello, ifconfig output like this;
>>>
>>> [root at sbe-60 root]# ifconfig -a
>>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:02:44:66:D3:32
>>>          inet addr:144.122.85.60  Bcast:144.122.85.255  
>>> Mask:255.255.255.0
>>>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>>          RX packets:301403 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>          TX packets:115798 errors:14 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>>          RX bytes:51269291 (48.8 Mb)  TX bytes:119416712 (113.8 Mb)
>>>          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xec00
>>>
>>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>>>          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>>>          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>>>          RX packets:54794 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>          TX packets:54794 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>>          RX bytes:101928795 (97.2 Mb)  TX bytes:101928795 (97.2 Mb)
>>>
>>> also,
>>> root at sbe-60 root]# mii-tool eth0
>>> eth0: 10 Mbit, half duplex, no link
>>> [root at sbe-60 root]# ping 144.122.199.20
>>> PING 144.122.199.20 (144.122.199.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=1.69 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.39 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.45 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=1.27 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.56 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.50 ms
>>> 64 bytes from 144.122.199.20: icmp_seq=6 ttl=63 time=1.58 ms
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you...
>>>
>>
>>
> My porblem like this;
>
> root at sbe-60 root]# mii-tool eth0
> eth0: 10 Mbit, half duplex, no link
>
> as you see, there is "no link" warning , what does  it mean?
> and I didn't change 10Mbit to 100Mbit with mii-tool.
> Do you have any suggestion?

You have said that everything works, but mii-tool is reporting no link.
This sounds like the tool is getting the wrong information, not like you 
really have a problem.







More information about the fedora-list mailing list