yum update 2179 kernel

Jeff Vian jvian10 at charter.net
Tue Apr 20 01:21:18 UTC 2004



John Fleming wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Eric Diamond" <eric at ediamond.net>
>To: "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:41 PM
>Subject: RE: yum update 2179 kernel
>
>
>  
>
>>Monday, April 19, 2004 3:16 PM John Fleming added:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Monday, April 19, 2004 3:10 PM Brian Chase helped with:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>... If you've got a day or two to see more posts
>>>>on this for better advice, you would be wise to get them all before
>>>>making any moves.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Thanks Brian.  I can wait.  I did run yum update again, but
>>>it just said all packages were up to date (as does up2date!).
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Sage advice under any circumstances...
>>
>>OK. Two questions:
>>
>>1) You say that yum/rpm/kernel packare is stating that there's no boot
>>loader configured, but yet you get the grub splash screen and kernel
>>choices... What does 'rpm -q grub' output?
>>    
>>
>
>grub-0.93-7
>
>  
>
>>AND
>>
>>2) What happens if you run 'rpm -e kernel-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl' and then
>>run 'yum update'?
>>    
>>
>
>1. Well, I ran "yum remove kernel-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl"
>
>and got "No Matches for (the above).
>
>2. Then I ran 'rpm -e .....' as above and it returned the console prompt.
>
>3.  Then I ran yum update - (I'm just used to using yum).  It didn't
>download anything, but said it was installing the kernel.  Then the
>aforementioned "no bootloader found" message, then a line that the kernel
>was installed.
>
>4.  Rebooted - Got the Grub 0.93 screen with the 2 old kernel choices.
>
>5.  Updated, this time with rpm graphical, and it downloaded the kernel -
>Downloaded and installed without errors, and suggested I reboot to use the
>new kernel.
>
>6.  The reboot yielded the graphical screen showing Grub 0.93 and STILL THE
>2 OLD KERNEL CHOICES!
>
>7.  Still no /boot/grub file, fwiw.
>
>Any help appreciated.  - John
>
>  
>
I believe you said that /boot/grub does not exist?
This seems weird if grub is actually installed and you are able to boot 
with grub.


>  
>





More information about the fedora-list mailing list