seti service script - proper run level (still problems)

[Rodolfo J. Paiz]

At 10:15 4/22/2004, you wrote:
>Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
>>On fast machines, returning results every four or five hours, there is 
>>significant time lost waiting two hours for the next run. Running it 
>>twice per hour means that (on average) my box waits 15-20 minutes idle 
>>before starting the next run.
>
>This sounds like you mean the Seti process terminates and has to be 
>restarted for each work unit. If it does, then something is wrong. I think 
>mine has terminated on its own only once in a year and a half.

Just checked on a couple of boxen and you are right... my setiathome 
processes have been running for a long time.


-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz at simpaticus.com
http://www.simpaticus.com