rndc problem

Alexander Dalloz alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de
Sat Aug 7 15:02:08 UTC 2004


Am Sa, den 07.08.2004 schrieb Dino Nardini um 16:52:

> I used yum to install bind* and caching-nameserver, accepting default 
> setups.  All I can say is that rndc won't load a command channel with 
> bind-chroot installed... it tries but fails on both 127.0.0.0#953 and 
> ::#953 (ipv6 notation I believe?).  Once I remove bind-chroot, it loads a 
> command channel just fine on 127.0.0.1#953.
> 
> It should be noted that I'm not all that familiar with the workings of 
> bind-chroot or rndc.  Any setup recommendations are welcome :)
> 
> Cheers... Dino

In your first posting you said you configured bind, now you are saying
it did not work already with the default setup coming right after
installation. It can't be both the case. So I asked for your specific
configuration.

$ netstat -tualpen | grep 953
tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:953           0.0.0.0:*              
LISTEN      25         9726       3736/named

Running fine in chrooted mode, with default configuration as well after
my customization. Did you remove the rndc key entry in
/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf? Any iptables rules active? You may
read the bind documentation first, because DNS is a serious, essential
service and proper working is needed for a lot of other things.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.7-1.494.2.2smp 
Serendipity 16:54:46 up 3 days, 10:22, load average: 0.05, 0.05, 0.06 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040807/74edfbe7/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list