FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?
David Jansen
jansen at strw.leidenuniv.nl
Wed Aug 18 16:02:37 UTC 2004
checking on /usr/bin/gs shows no dependency on gtk+ :
$ ldd /usr/bin/gsx
libgs.so.7 => /usr/lib/libgs.so.7 (0x00556000)
libgtk-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 (0x0015a000)
libgdk-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0 (0x00d07000)
libgmodule-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0 (0x00b63000)
libglib-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x00c39000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00468000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x00111000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x00119000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x002a2000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00127000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00d3f000)
libVFlib2.so.24 => /usr/lib/libVFlib2.so.24 (0x00380000)
libttf.so.2 => /usr/lib/libttf.so.2 (0x003b3000)
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x003d9000)
libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x00fb2000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x00149000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x003fd000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x0044e000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x0046b000)
libgimpprint.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgimpprint.so.1 (0x00b66000)
libcupsimage.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcupsimage.so.2 (0x004a3000)
libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0x004b6000)
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x00e78000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x00456000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0048d000)
libtiff.so.3 => /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 (0x004d2000)
libssl.so.4 => /lib/libssl.so.4 (0x00513000)
libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x00fd0000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00cf9000)
libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00b4e000)
libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00c5e000)
libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00482000)
libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00cc7000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x00c27000)
So removing the duplicate /usr/bin/gsx and removing the requirement in
the .spec file could resolve this packaging bug. Or am I overlooking
something?
David Jansen
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list