Is Fedora Core slower than RH 9 ?

John Summerfield debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Thu Dec 2 14:49:04 UTC 2004


On Thursday 02 December 2004 13:33, steve_dum at mentorg.com wrote:
> While not quite the same comparison, I upgraded a RH 7.2 machine
> and found that overall the amount of memory required for an idle
> system with a gnome desktop open, increased by a factor of 4!
> My aging laptop had 77M of ram and 200M of swap space.  It ran

I (wife actually) used to run RHL 6.2 ona Pentium 133 with 64 Mbytes of RAM.

Now she has a Pentium III 550 with 256 Mb, I have an Athlon 1400 with 512 
Mbytes and plan on trebling it.




-- 

Cheers
John Summerfield
tourist pics: http://environmental.disaster.cds.merseine.nu/




More information about the fedora-list mailing list