Spam Filter for sendmail

[Ow Mun Heng]

On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 06:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am So, den 05.12.2004 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 22:59:
> 
> > spamass-milter is known to not fail more often than it should.
> 
> Ups, the "not" is wrong in that sentence. There reverse was meant :)
> 
> spamass-milter is known to fail more often than it should.

And I already was trying to determine if my english comprehension
sucked.

Spamass-milter works great for me. It's resource intensive though.

--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz 
Neuromancer 14:20:33 up 5:01, 5 users, 0.71, 0.42, 0.41