Corrupted Drive
Ben Steeves
ben.steeves at gmail.com
Fri Dec 3 20:37:05 UTC 2004
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:48:40 -0500, Henry Hartley
<henryhartley at westat.com> wrote:
> My question...
>
> Is there something I should be doing to prevent this sort of thing? On a
> system that doesn't get rebooted very often, should fsck be run manually
> from time to time? Or would this just cause the same sort of problem? Any
> suggestions so that I don't have a repeat of this next November would be
> appreciated.
Disks that run continuously for months/years are most likely to fail
when unexpectedly powered down then powered up again. To prevent a
single disk failure from taking down your server, you should always
run (at a minimum) RAID-1 mirroring on two disks, or better yet,
RAID-10 (i.e., mirrored stripes) over more disks. If economy of disk
is important, you might consider RAID-5 instead.
If system failures are not considered an option, you might consider a
SAN. But then you're talking real money.
fsck'ing a filesystem periodically probably isn't necessary; fsck is
meant as a last resort to fix your filesystem when something bad has
happened. Running fsck on a good filesystem probably wouldn't achieve
much.
--
Ben Steeves _ bcs at metacon.ca
The ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) ben.steeves at gmail.com
against HTML e-mail X GPG ID: 0xB3EBF1D9
http://www.metacon.ca/bcs / \ Yahoo Messenger: ben_steeves
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list