Before I install Fedora Core 3...
Norman Nunn
npnunn at verizon.net
Sat Dec 4 23:15:51 UTC 2004
I have found FC3 works better in most ways than FC2, especially the auto
mounting feature for USB devices. That is slick. I have continued to
be very pleased with the FC updates.
I did have serious trouble with CrossOver 4.0. If you are dependent on
that to run MSOffice, you may want to wait for the update due out soon.
I had to edit grub.conf because it set up the boot menu as hidden.
Also, the setup did not present a means to add other partitions on the
disk for win2000, dos and my data partitions.
Also, I have found it is generally a good idea to look over the archives
for any problems with a new release that might affect my installation.
Norm
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 17:12 -0500, John Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 13:53:58 -0800, Robert Johnson <rwj04 at comcast.net> wrote:
> > ... Would *you* install it if you had to do it over again? Or would you
> > stay with Fedora Core 2? Or another distro entirely?
> >
> > I ask this because I cant believe all the troubles so many people are
> > having. Is there something wrong with Core 3?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> I think troubles depends on your hardware. I did a clean install on a
> Compaq laptop (Presario 2100) and had NO problems this time.
> John
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list