FC2 -> FC3 upgrade question

[Wong Kwok-hon]

On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:38:17 -0500, Michael J. Pawlowsky
<mikep at mi-consultants.com> wrote:
> Jay Moore wrote:
> 
> > In my opinion, the ideal would be an OS upgrade every 3-4 years, and/or
> >
> >some better (more complete?) tools for automating the upgrade process.
> >I'm sure this is a pretty difficult thing to do, but I'm into wishful
> >thinking today :)
> >
> >
> I have to agree with you there. I''m not really sure what consist of a
> major upgrade for FC.
> Why not simply call it FC (no numeral) and keep upgrading the packages
> an that's it.
> 
> It almost seems like a race simply to get out another major version...
> when there seems to be so many little bug fixes improvements that can be
> made and still call it FC3 or whatever.
> 
> This seems like a "Commercial Software" cycle thing. Where we need to
> get out a version before the 1st quarter of 05 to bring in some revenues
> from upgrades.  ;-)

Yes, I feel we are the tester of a software sometimes.
But RedHat is become a commerical software like others.
So no choice to continue to use it....

Ringo