software raid and grub on FC3
Aleksandar Milivojevic
amilivojevic at pbl.ca
Mon Dec 6 14:21:54 UTC 2004
Paul Pianta wrote:
> Is this bug report worthy?
Maybe, but I wouldn't be suprised if nobody runs to fix it.
> In its current form - I don't really see Fedora/RedHat software raid as
> being a complete RAID 'solution' - without having the ability to
> disconnect either disk and instantly boot from the other ...
Use LILO instead. If you choose LILO as your boot loader during
install, Anaconda will install it on both disk drives (if your boot
partition is mirrored). Actually, Anaconda will just write correct LILO
confing file, and LILO itself will install correctly (if you have for
example "boot=/dev/md0" in lilo.conf, LILO will check what md0 is, and
install itself to all submirrors of md0).
This issue with Grub is the primary reason I'm still using LILO. I kind
of got tired of fixing it on each and every install I'm doing (well, I
automated it as part of postinstall script in kickstart configuration
file, but still liked LILO built-in understanding of mirrors better).
And anyhow, if you are not in fancy graphics, and/or don't have really
complicated boot configuration, there is not any advantage of using Grub.
> Should I file a bug report?
Doesn't cost you a thing to try. But first check if somebody else
reported it. It is such an old issue that it is very likely there's
already bug report for that. If you decide to report it, my personal
opinion is that this is something that should be delt with in Grub
itself, not in Anaconda installer. Grub should be made aware of mirrors
(just the same as LILO is aware of mirrors), and install itself
automatically on all submirrors.
--
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic at pbl.ca> Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator 1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276 Winnipeg, MB R3T 1L7
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list