The (d)evolution of Evolution

[Craig White]

On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 11:43 -0800, Brian Mury wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-12 at 11:51 -0500, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> >          I have been using Evolution for my email for quite a while
> > now. It always seemed to me that every version increase would lose
> > some feature or function that was great.  Over all it keeps getting
> > worse and worse as the versions go up.  Now FC3 ships with Evolution
> > 2.  The UI changes are really bad.
> 
> I agree. One of the Evolution developers contributed to a recent thread
> that I initiated on the Evolution mail list. The gist of it was that
> he's been reading too many UI design books, thinks that configuration
> options make for bad UI's, and if you don't like it, too bad.
----
to some extent - that is something I can agree with. The
preferences/options/settings in Outlook 2003 and now 2004 are incredibly
complicated/stupid and indicative of UI gone haywire.

Craig