Experience with ATRPMS repository?

A1tmblwd at netscape.net A1tmblwd at netscape.net
Tue Dec 7 17:39:06 UTC 2004


Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net> wrote:

>On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:12:39AM -0500, A1tmblwd at netscape.net wrote:
>> The other problem I have is that he is providing updates for
>> packages provided by Fedora Core with a dependency for a piece of
>> code that FC does not require.
>
>Please check the facts before making such accusatory statements.
>
>As a vendor Red Hat ships perl packages that go into the vendors
>folders. The debate about perl's path is that (versioned) site folders
>should be at the top of the search path. That is not the case with the
>default perl packaging, and therefore spacial handling _is_ required.
>
>But freely quoting from your bug report "I don't care about
>explanations". Currently you are only contributing FUD. If you still
>believe in conspiracy theory, then stop using ATrpms, and setup
>atrpms-is-evil.org.


I have no intention of starting an atrpms-is-evil.org site. You are not evil. You have good intentions, poor implementation.  

Enough on this subject.  Time to move on.

I bid you peace,

Kam


__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp




More information about the fedora-list mailing list