IPSEC / VPN - Feature Request for FC4
Roger Grosswiler
roger at gwch.net
Tue Dec 14 06:30:31 UTC 2004
Leonard Isham schrieb:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:31:12 +0100, Roger Grosswiler <roger at gwch.net> wrote:
>
>>Alex Evonosky wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Leonard Isham wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Consider OpenVPN http://openvpn.sourceforge.net.
>>>>
>>>
>>>yes, the openVPN is very solid. We use it in production enviroments
>>>with no issues. I must say, we migrated off freeSWAN onto openVPN, and
>>>this software really is good.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>ok, but how about the implemented ipsec-solution under fc3? is this not
>>usable?
>>
>
>
> Possible, but not easy. For one thing you'll need a new kernel.
> FreeSWAN has stopped development, byt two others have arisen from it's
> ashes StrongSWAN and OpenSWAN.
>
> Some googling should get you the answers you need.
>
>
Hi guys,
was looking for openvpn, which is really a good thing. why not making
life easier for newbies like me and put openvpn in FC4?
I was looking for IPSEC too but was stopping then as i have to implement
a SIMPLE solution for linux & windoze..
Roger
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list