IPSEC / VPN - Feature Request for FC4

Roger Grosswiler roger at gwch.net
Tue Dec 14 06:30:31 UTC 2004


Leonard Isham schrieb:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:31:12 +0100, Roger Grosswiler <roger at gwch.net> wrote:
> 
>>Alex Evonosky wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Leonard Isham wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Consider OpenVPN http://openvpn.sourceforge.net.
>>>>
>>>
>>>yes, the openVPN is very solid.  We use it in production enviroments
>>>with no issues.  I must say, we migrated off freeSWAN onto openVPN, and
>>>this software really is good.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>ok, but how about the implemented ipsec-solution under fc3? is this not
>>usable?
>>
> 
> 
> Possible, but not easy.  For one thing you'll need a new kernel. 
> FreeSWAN has stopped development, byt two others have arisen from it's
> ashes StrongSWAN and OpenSWAN.
> 
> Some googling should get you the answers you need.
> 
> 
Hi guys,

was looking for openvpn, which is really a good thing. why not making 
life easier for newbies like me and put openvpn in FC4?

I was looking for IPSEC too but was stopping then as i have to implement 
a SIMPLE solution for linux & windoze..

Roger




More information about the fedora-list mailing list