Fedora on servers .

[Brad Alpert]

On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 23:43 +0000, Paul Flanders wrote:
> I have many RH9 servers running and need to upgrade, i have been putting
> in FC1 servers as 'i feel' it seems bit safer knowing that FC1 was very
> stable has lots of updates and runs well on DELL servers and after the
> hassle with FC2 (ended up going back to FC1) and FC3 (can not get samba
> working fully 'dont ask!') I think at the moment ill stick to RH9 and
> FC1. The "legacy" 15-18 month business is a bit worrying especially if
> the FC versions cycle out very quickly. I may look at RH Enterprise but
> there is a cost to it. I manage over 50 RH servers and i really dont
> like the idea of upgrading them all to often especially when so much
> seems to break between versions.
> 
> Paul

I was in a similar situation.  Whitebox Enterprise Linux did the trick
for me.  WBEL is RHEL 3.0, without the branding, and with excellent
updating capability.

http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/

Brad