krb5-libs problem ? - About Hijack ...
Kevork
rxlm at comintec.com.ar
Fri Feb 6 02:30:03 UTC 2004
Oh !, I understand now ! ...
I'm very sorry, I didn't know that detail.
Thank you for the explanation,
I'm sorry for any trouble it could produce.
Best Regards,
Jorge.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Zimmerman" <mzimmerman at virginia.edu>
To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: krb5-libs problem ?
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 06:55:41AM -0300, Kevork wrote:
> > > First: DO NOT hijack foreign threads!
> > Sorry, what did U do wrong ? ... Don't understand you.
>
> He means don't do a `Reply' to an existing message and change
> the subject to start a discussion on a new topic. You should
> send a `New' message to fedora-list at redhat.com instead.
>
> A lot of mailreaders have a feature that group messages that
> are replies to one another into a tree structure called
> a thread. If you assume that all the messages in a thread
> are on the same subject, you can eliminate a whole set of
> messages you may not be interested in by deleting the whole
> thread at once, thus saving time.
>
> However, by replying to an unrelated message, you start a new
> discussion on a new topic that *should* be in a new thread but
> gets mixed into an existing thread, or `foreign', thread. Thus
> if you delete the original thread, you may be throwing away
> messages you are interested in, i.e., on the new topic, without
> knowing about it. This process is widely known as `hijacking'.
>
> --
> Matt
>
> Matthew Zimmerman
> Interdisciplinary Biophysics, University of Virginia
> http://www.people.virginia.edu/~mdz4c/
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list