RH now exiting 1 more data center
Res
res at ausics.net
Wed Feb 25 22:19:11 UTC 2004
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 16:33, Res wrote:
>
> > > FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was. The only disadvantage to
> > > Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle. It will cost a lot more in
> >
> > what rubbish, see my original post.
>
> I did. You are not correct on this but it seems that you are firmly
> entrenched in your beliefs that no amount of logic or proof would change
> your mind.
Really... proof ? I see all the proof I need every day right here.
I wouldnt put fedora on a mail server doing 10 msgs a second leta lone 100
which RH9 handles without effort, as does the slackware boxes :)
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list