RedHat, Fedora future?

[Peter Santiago]

Preston Crawford said:
> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:48, David L Norris wrote:
>> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:50, Robin Laing wrote:
>> > I like Fedora but I don't like that it doesn't follow the standards as
>> > laid down by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
>> > <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/index.html>
>>
>> How is Fedora violating FHS?  It might be helpful to enumerate one or
>> more deficiencies instead of just saying "Naughty naughty Fedora doesn't
>> follow standards."
>>
>> I'd truly be interested to know because I don't see anything which
>> obviously violates FHS.  A cursory glance would suggest that FC1 is
>> completely FHS 2.2 compliant.
>>
>> Also, LSB compliance in FC1 is provided by the redhat-lsb package.
>
> Same here. I've used other distros that are very LSB-compliant (SuSE)
> and Fedora seems just as good from what I can see.
>

As for me, I'm happily running Fedora, actually an upgrade from RH9.
Filesytem layout is identical to that of Redhat.

Peter